{"v":"<p dir=\"auto\">Done in 7f9771e.<\/p>\n<p dir=\"auto\"><strong>Cause.<\/strong> On the PCS consent, the PAS\/PHC consent and the Private Pay agreement, the &#34;Witness 1&#34; \/ &#34;Witness 2&#34; lines were defined as typed text, even though the paper says the witnesses must <em>sign<\/em> there. Because they weren&#39;t signatures, no signing claimed the date beside them, so the interview asked for it. The H2076 already had witness signatures and wasn&#39;t affected.<\/p>\n<p dir=\"auto\"><strong>Change.<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul dir=\"auto\">\n<li><code>witness_1<\/code> \/ <code>witness_2<\/code> on those three forms are now signature fields. Their boxes print a drawn signature and are sized like the release signature (checked on proofs of all three forms).<\/li>\n<li>Each witness has their own signing line, and the date beside it is stamped when the witness taps Sign.<\/li>\n<li>The 12 witness name and date questions are removed from the SOC\/AO interview. The witness gives their name when adopting a signature.<\/li>\n<li>Pipeline fix: the interview import read the <em>published<\/em> placements, so a signing line added in the same import was invisible and its date came back as a question. <code>form_v2_signing_maps()<\/code> now prefers a placement&#39;s draft during import.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p dir=\"auto\"><strong>Until W4 (#114) is done<\/strong>, the witness lines are owed on every visit. Staff use &#34;Record why&#34; on each one when no witness is needed. #114 is where witnesses become required only for an X signature.<\/p>\n<p dir=\"auto\"><strong>To apply:<\/strong> the rehearsal on dev passes all nine checks. Publish on <code>\/admin\/form-v2-publish<\/code>, then choose the release on <code>\/admin\/form-v2-releases<\/code>.<\/p>\n"}