{"v":"<p dir=\"auto\"><strong>Most of this was already in place. The gaps are now closed (not yet published).<\/strong><\/p>\n<p dir=\"auto\">Already built (25 Sep):<\/p>\n<ul dir=\"auto\">\n<li>The agency&#39;s details are kept per agency: legal name, toll-free and 24-hour numbers, administrator.<\/li>\n<li>Each <strong>branch office&#39;s<\/strong> address, phone, fax and vendor number are kept per branch.<\/li>\n<li>Both are maintained by a Superuser at <strong>Superuser Tools \u2192 Systems<\/strong> (<em>Branch Offices<\/em>), and they fill every form from the client&#39;s branch.<\/li>\n<li>No interview question asks for any of them.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p dir=\"auto\">Done today:<\/p>\n<ul dir=\"auto\">\n<li><strong>A missing detail is reported.<\/strong> Nothing marks these fields required, so a missing one printed blank without a word. The visit&#39;s check now lists each one that is not on file, with the forms it would print blank on and where to enter it (<code>form_v2_visit_office_missing()<\/code>). Like any check item, it can be skipped.<\/li>\n<li><strong>The 3040&#39;s Vendor No. now reads the branch&#39;s number<\/strong>, as the service plan already did. Before, it read the agency&#39;s, which is an NPI on file. Which number belongs on which form (vendor or contract) is still #117 (F1).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p dir=\"auto\"><strong>Waiting on the customer:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol dir=\"auto\">\n<li><strong>The branch details need entering.<\/strong> Every branch row is blank on the dev database; production not checked. Until they are entered, the service plan and the Coordination of Care print no office address, phone, fax or vendor number, and the check will say so.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Contract number<\/strong> prints on no form today. If #117&#39;s answer is &#34;contract number on some forms&#34;, it gets a column beside the vendor number then.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p dir=\"auto\">H4 (#94, the coordinator per branch) can live on the same Branch Offices table when it&#39;s picked up.<\/p>\n"}